Thursday, 15 May 2008

This is the future for Brian Howes and Kerry Howes if Extradited.

By Chris Summers
BBC News

Shaun Attwood during his stockbroker days
Shaun Attwood, serving a nine-and-a-half-year sentence
A British stockbroker in jail in the United States has been lifting the lid on a controversial prison regime through a compelling weblog.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio forces inmates to wear pink underpants, puts women on chain gangs and brags that it costs more to feed the guard dogs than the prisoners he oversees. No surprise then that he is often called America's "toughest sheriff".

But while his hardline tactics have won him plenty of admirers among the voting public of Maricopa county, Arizona, they have outraged human rights campaigners.

Now, as Mr Arpaio seeks re-election to his job, few would have suspected one of his most vocal critics to be a 35-year-old stockbroker from Widnes, Cheshire.

Shaun Attwood landed in Mr Arpaio's authority after he was arrested in connection with raves he organised in and around Phoenix. Through a series of letters, penned from the confines of his remand centre, and published on the net, Mr Attwood has shed light on a controversial prison regime.

Hardline regime

Sheriff Arpaio's prison policies have made headlines across the United States. He reinstated chain gangs, for women and juveniles, as well as men, forces inmates to wear pink underwear and the old fashioned black and white hooped uniforms, and hit on the idea of housing minor offenders in a huge "Tent City" in the desert.

SHAUN ATTWOOD'S STORY
1991: Moves from UK to Arizona, US, and gets a job as stockbroker
Late 1990s: Quits job to become a full-time rave promoter in Phoenix area
May 2002: Arrested on charges of money laundering and held on remand.
Jul 2004: Sentenced to nine-and-a-half years and moved to a prison with 'better conditions'
Oct 2004: Still blogging and campaigning against sheriff Joe Arpaio
Mr Arpaio, whose jurisdiction covers Arizona's capital, Phoenix, is defiant about his policies although insists he runs a "humane jail system".

Nevertheless, Shaun Attwood's online diary tells a disturbing story of life in the Maricopa penal system, which he calls "subhuman". Attwood, who has since been moved to a more lenient state prison, and thus out of sheriff Arpaio's control, managed his weblog with the help of his father, Derick, back in the UK.

Fleeing the British recession of the time, Attwood, an economics graduate then fresh out of Liverpool University, moved to Phoenix in 1991 where his two aunts lived. He took local exams before getting work as a stockbroker and, as a successful day trader, earned about £1m.

But he became bored with the world of financial markets and opted to turn his hobby into a full-time job. A fan of the rave culture in Liverpool, Attwood took his love of dance music with him when he moved to the US. By the late 1990s he was organising several large raves in and around Phoenix.

It was a role which eventually saw him arrested, and convicted for money laundering and drugs offences. After more than two years in a remand prison, run by Sheriff Arpaio, he was sentenced, in July this year, to nine-and-a-half years inside.

Pencilled pleas

His weblog started after Attwood began writing to one of his aunts in Arizona. Attwood wrote his notes using a tiny, blunt pencil stub - proper pens and pencils are banned as potential weapons - and paper, which was frequently sodden from sweat because of the intense heat in the prison.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio
Everybody complains - but if you don't like it, you don't violate the law and you won't come back
Sheriff Joe Arpaio
Although bleak and depressing, the letters were also "beautifully written and deeply moving", according to his father, Derick, to whom they were passed on. Inspired by the example of Salam Pax, the so-called Baghdad Blogger, Derick Attwood set up a weblog in an effort to publicise his son's views.

Fearing repercussions, Derick Attwood initially made the blog anonymous, calling it simply Jon's Jail Journal. A picture of Shaun Attwood was only added in the summer, after his move to the state prison.

Attwood's weblog makes disturbing reading and includes a catalogue of alleged breaches of human rights for those on remand. They include:

  • prison food being mixture with rotten meat, fruit and vegetables and mouldy bread. Attwood even says he saw a rat's head in one stew;
  • cells infested with cockroaches;
  • coolers which did not work and temperatures frequently touching 100°F.

    Ruby Wax visiting one of the jails in Maricopa County
    No laughing matter: Ruby Wax visits prison guards in Maricopa
    Speaking to the BBC News website, Mr Arpaio defended his regime.

    "I feel that you should be tough on crime and run a tough jail. They don't get steaks, movies, porno, cigarettes or alcohol, but it's humane," he says. "Everybody complains - but if you don't like it, you don't violate the law and you won't come back. "

    It's a record he will be judged on later this month when Mr Arpaio, along with thousands of sheriffs, police chiefs and district attorneys across the US, comes up for re-election. He will be running on a Republican party ticket.

    Although his Democrat challenger Bob Ayala is highly critical of the Arpaio rule, Derick Attwood says he is unlikely to break the sheriff's stronghold.

    Meanwhile, Shaun Attwood's mother, Barbara takes comfort in the belief that her son has done something to lift the lid on Maricopa county's extraordinary prison regime.

    "One of the guards once told Shaun 'nobody knows what's going on in here'," says Barbara Attwood. "Well they do now."


  • Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

    This is the future for Brian Howes and Kerry Howes if Extradited.

    By Chris Summers
    BBC News

    Shaun Attwood during his stockbroker days
    Shaun Attwood, serving a nine-and-a-half-year sentence
    A British stockbroker in jail in the United States has been lifting the lid on a controversial prison regime through a compelling weblog.

    Sheriff Joe Arpaio forces inmates to wear pink underpants, puts women on chain gangs and brags that it costs more to feed the guard dogs than the prisoners he oversees. No surprise then that he is often called America's "toughest sheriff".

    But while his hardline tactics have won him plenty of admirers among the voting public of Maricopa county, Arizona, they have outraged human rights campaigners.

    Now, as Mr Arpaio seeks re-election to his job, few would have suspected one of his most vocal critics to be a 35-year-old stockbroker from Widnes, Cheshire.

    Shaun Attwood landed in Mr Arpaio's authority after he was arrested in connection with raves he organised in and around Phoenix. Through a series of letters, penned from the confines of his remand centre, and published on the net, Mr Attwood has shed light on a controversial prison regime.

    Hardline regime

    Sheriff Arpaio's prison policies have made headlines across the United States. He reinstated chain gangs, for women and juveniles, as well as men, forces inmates to wear pink underwear and the old fashioned black and white hooped uniforms, and hit on the idea of housing minor offenders in a huge "Tent City" in the desert.

    SHAUN ATTWOOD'S STORY
    1991: Moves from UK to Arizona, US, and gets a job as stockbroker
    Late 1990s: Quits job to become a full-time rave promoter in Phoenix area
    May 2002: Arrested on charges of money laundering and held on remand.
    Jul 2004: Sentenced to nine-and-a-half years and moved to a prison with 'better conditions'
    Oct 2004: Still blogging and campaigning against sheriff Joe Arpaio
    Mr Arpaio, whose jurisdiction covers Arizona's capital, Phoenix, is defiant about his policies although insists he runs a "humane jail system".

    Nevertheless, Shaun Attwood's online diary tells a disturbing story of life in the Maricopa penal system, which he calls "subhuman". Attwood, who has since been moved to a more lenient state prison, and thus out of sheriff Arpaio's control, managed his weblog with the help of his father, Derick, back in the UK.

    Fleeing the British recession of the time, Attwood, an economics graduate then fresh out of Liverpool University, moved to Phoenix in 1991 where his two aunts lived. He took local exams before getting work as a stockbroker and, as a successful day trader, earned about £1m.

    But he became bored with the world of financial markets and opted to turn his hobby into a full-time job. A fan of the rave culture in Liverpool, Attwood took his love of dance music with him when he moved to the US. By the late 1990s he was organising several large raves in and around Phoenix.

    It was a role which eventually saw him arrested, and convicted for money laundering and drugs offences. After more than two years in a remand prison, run by Sheriff Arpaio, he was sentenced, in July this year, to nine-and-a-half years inside.

    Pencilled pleas

    His weblog started after Attwood began writing to one of his aunts in Arizona. Attwood wrote his notes using a tiny, blunt pencil stub - proper pens and pencils are banned as potential weapons - and paper, which was frequently sodden from sweat because of the intense heat in the prison.

    Sheriff Joe Arpaio
    Everybody complains - but if you don't like it, you don't violate the law and you won't come back
    Sheriff Joe Arpaio
    Although bleak and depressing, the letters were also "beautifully written and deeply moving", according to his father, Derick, to whom they were passed on. Inspired by the example of Salam Pax, the so-called Baghdad Blogger, Derick Attwood set up a weblog in an effort to publicise his son's views.

    Fearing repercussions, Derick Attwood initially made the blog anonymous, calling it simply Jon's Jail Journal. A picture of Shaun Attwood was only added in the summer, after his move to the state prison.

    Attwood's weblog makes disturbing reading and includes a catalogue of alleged breaches of human rights for those on remand. They include:

  • prison food being mixture with rotten meat, fruit and vegetables and mouldy bread. Attwood even says he saw a rat's head in one stew;
  • cells infested with cockroaches;
  • coolers which did not work and temperatures frequently touching 100°F.

    Ruby Wax visiting one of the jails in Maricopa County
    No laughing matter: Ruby Wax visits prison guards in Maricopa
    Speaking to the BBC News website, Mr Arpaio defended his regime.

    "I feel that you should be tough on crime and run a tough jail. They don't get steaks, movies, porno, cigarettes or alcohol, but it's humane," he says. "Everybody complains - but if you don't like it, you don't violate the law and you won't come back. "

    It's a record he will be judged on later this month when Mr Arpaio, along with thousands of sheriffs, police chiefs and district attorneys across the US, comes up for re-election. He will be running on a Republican party ticket.

    Although his Democrat challenger Bob Ayala is highly critical of the Arpaio rule, Derick Attwood says he is unlikely to break the sheriff's stronghold.

    Meanwhile, Shaun Attwood's mother, Barbara takes comfort in the belief that her son has done something to lift the lid on Maricopa county's extraordinary prison regime.

    "One of the guards once told Shaun 'nobody knows what's going on in here'," says Barbara Attwood. "Well they do now."


  • Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

    Friday, 11 April 2008

    Three more years of torment - Queensferry Today

    Three more years of torment



    An anxious wait for news
    An anxious wait for news
    An anxious wait for news
    Click on thumbnail to view image
    Click on thumbnail to view image
    Click on thumbnail to view image


    A BO'NESS man this week spoke of the strain on his family as the courts considered a request for his extradition to America to face criminal charges.
    Sheriff Isabella McColl has ruled that Brian Howes (44) and his wife, Kerry-Ann (30), who were married on April 1, should be extradited but the final decision lies with Justice Minister Kenny MacAskill.

    The couple face an 82-charge indictment alleging conspiracy to supply chemicals which are illegal in the United States.

    But with an appeal pending it could be years before the family knows its fate.

    Said Mr Howes, of Bridgeness Road: "The last months have been extremely stressful for me, my wife Kerry-Ann, and my family. Our businesses have been destroyed and we have been unable to work.

    "It will be at least a year before our appeal is heard in the High Court and if that fails we'll take it to the European courts.

    "If that fails and we are, eventually, extradited to the United States we could face another two years on remand before appearing in court.

    "If we survived two years of State Prison we could each face up to 98 years in jail if the authorities were able to prove we were involved in a conspiracy to manufacture illegal drugs.

    "By that time our four children would be either in care or fostered out, possibly even adopted."

    Mr Howes is adamant that he did not knowingly distribute red phosphorus and iodine to customers in the United States who were manufacturing methamphetamine, commonly known as crystal meth.

    He alleges that the American authorities included the word "conspiracy" in the key charge, in the belief that it would force a reaction from their British counterparts.

    And he said: "We've got no chance of a fair trial in the United States."
    But Mr Howes, who is from the Cleveland area of northern England, had praise for the
    Scottish legal system, and particularly for Sheriff Isabella McColl.

    "The Procurator Fiscal was again pushing for us to be taken into custody but Sheriff McColl was strong enough to resist that and let our family stay together," he said.

    He emphasised: "We took legal advice and were told that we were not breaking any laws.

    "We did not know that the chemicals were being misused.

    "No evidence was ever produced to extradite us and I believe extradition without evidence is wrong. We're going to take this fight as far as we have to."

    However, Detective Super-intendent Dave Duffey of Cleveland Police, who led Operation Enfield – which investigated the supply of chemicals over the internet – said: "The Sheriff's decision constitutes a significant step towards finalising the extradition process."

    allan@journalandgazette.co.uk

    Wednesday, 2 April 2008

    Chemical charges couple get wed before deportation fight - Scotsman.com News

    • Published Date: 01 April 2008
    • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
    • Location: Edinburgh

    Chemical charges couple get wed before deportation fight



    Kerry and Brian Howie attend their wedding despite facing extradition to the U.S. Picture: Ed Jones
    Kerry and Brian Howes attend their wedding despite facing extradition to the U.S. Picture: Ed Jones
    Kerry and Brian Howie attend their wedding despite facing extradition to the U.S. Picture: Ed Jones
    Click on thumbnail to view image
    Click on thumbnail to view image
    Click on thumbnail to view image


    A COUPLE fighting extradition to America amid claims that they sold banned chemicals over the internet today prepared for the next stage of their legal battle – by getting married.
    Brian Howes and partner Kerry Ann Shanks were due to be accompanied by their four young daughters as bridesmaids at a service at Bo'ness Registrar's Office this morning.

    The couple plan to spend their first day of marriage warning the four girls – aged from two to ten – that they could be just hours away from forced separation.

    The couple are due to appear at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Thursday to hear whether they will face deportation to America, where they could face a jail term of almost 100 years.

    US authorities claim they knowingly sold chemicals through their Bo'ness-based internet supplies company for use in the manufacture of the synthetic drug methamphetamine, also known as crystal meth.

    Mr Howes, 44, and Ms Shanks, 29, argue the chemicals – red phosphorus and iodine – have been sold through their firm around the UK, Europe and Canada without a problem. They deny 80 charges in the US indictment which allege they were involved in a $60-80 million drugs ring.

    Despite never being formally charged in relation to any offence in the UK, both were remanded in custody for seven months following an earlier extradition hearing.

    They were released on bail after Mr Howes had spent a month on hunger strike in Saughton prison protesting his innocence.

    "We've been talking about getting married for years," said Mr Howes. "We thought that this might well be our last chance – it might be the last time we are both free together.

    "We're having a small family wedding with the girls as our bridesmaids. Kerry has picked a nice dress. We've even hired a limo and booked a nice restaurant. It's not a lavish do though, we've had to borrow money to pay for it."

    The shoestring wedding comes despite allegations that the pair made hundreds of thousands selling chemicals to illegal US drug laboratories.

    The claims emerged after a raid on the couple's home and internet business
    last year when American drug enforcement officers joined Scottish police in a detailed search of their property. Later, US officials claimed the two chemicals – which are legal in Scotland but tightly controlled in America – had been knowingly sold for drug manufacture. A warrant for their arrest and extradition was issued by a court in Phoenix, Arizona.

    The couple, who sold more than 40 different chemicals through their firm, insist they did not know what the substances might be used for. "How could we know what someone was using it for?" said Mr Howes. "We took legal advice and were told it was up to the purchaser to make sure they were acting legally."

    He added: "We have been banged up in jail with hardened criminals but we haven't done anything wrong. We know we might be back in jail on Thursday, so we're determined to make sure our wedding day is the best it can be."


    The full article contains 515 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
    Last Updated: 01 April 2008 11:28 AM



    Kerry and Brian Howie attend their wedding despite facing extradition to the U.S. Picture: Ed Jones
    Kerry and Brian Howie attend their wedding despite facing extradition to the U.S. Picture: Ed Jones
    Kerry and Brian Howie attend their wedding despite facing extradition to the U.S. Picture: Ed Jones
    Click on thumbnail to view image
    Click on thumbnail to view image
    Click on thumbnail to view image

    « Previous
    « Previous
    Next »
    Next »

    View Gallery
    By SANDRA DICK
    A COUPLE fighting extradition to America amid claims that they sold banned chemicals over the internet today prepared for the next stage of their legal battle – by getting married.
    Brian Howes and partner Kerry Ann Shanks were due to be"

    Wednesday, 19 March 2008

    BBC NEWS | England | Tees | Wrongly jailed Pc denies speeding

    Wrongly jailed Pc denies speeding
    Sultan Alam (courtesy Northern Echo)
    Mr Alam continued to protest his innocence after being jailed
    A Teesside police officer, wrongly jailed when colleagues suppressed evidence is facing a charge of speeding on the day his conviction was quashed.

    Pc Sultan Alam was allegedly clocked breaking a 40mph speed limit on the A66 in Middlesbrough on 19 November.

    The 45-year-old of Church Lane, Acklam, pleaded not guilty in writing at Teesside Magistrates' Court on Tuesday.

    He had a 1996 conviction for conspiracy to steal motor vehicle parts quashed on appeal also on 19 November last year.

    Pc Alam, who joined Cleveland Police in 1984, was dismissed upon conviction and served nine months of his 18-month jail term.

    'deliberately misled'

    At his appeal court hearing, Lord Justice Moore-Bick ruled that police officers had "deliberately misled" the court "in order to suppress evidence".

    The father-of-two has said he was targeted by fellow officers when he brought a racial discrimination case against the force in 1993.

    Pc Alam returned to work with the Cleveland force on 3 March and was welcomed by Chief Constable Sean Price - the same man who has taken his speeding case to court.

    In a statement Acting Deputy Chief Constable Derek Bonnard, of Cleveland Police, said: "I can confirm that Sultan Alam was stopped for exceeding the speed limit and served with a summons.

    "I understand he pleaded not guilty on the basis that the information put before the court was incorrect.

    "It is now a matter for the Crown Prosecution Service as to whether a summons is re-issued."

    Pc Alam said a administration error was to blame. A trial has been set for May.

    Tuesday, 18 March 2008

    US legal system 'worse than Russia' - Times Online

    US legal system 'worse than Russia' - Times Online: "From Times Online
    March 18, 2008
    US legal system 'worse than Russia'
    A survey shows that European in-house lawyers would rather face litigation in China and Russia than in America
    Michael Herman

    Fear of the American legal system has created an atmosphere in which lawyers working for European businesses would prefer to face a major dispute in Russia or China than the US, a study has revealed.

    A survey of 180 in-house counsel working in five European countries identified the US as the jurisdiction they were keenest to avoid, with 29 per cent naming it the country they were most concerned about facing a major dispute in.

    The US attracted almost twice as many votes as Russia and China. Despite fears of political interference and corruption in their legal processes, both were named by just 16 per cent of in-house counsel as their most feared jurisdiction.

    The survey, commissioned by Lovells, the international law firm, noted that “while in-house lawyers are relatively comfortable with managing disputes in their own countries, there is great concern regarding the unknowns in different markets”.
    Related Links

    * Beware the long arm of American law

    * Partial win for Norris in US extradition battle

    * Long arm of US could put Britons in prison"

    Thursday, 13 March 2008

    Comment is free: Taking liberties




    Taking liberties Fighting terror and preserving freedom are only contradictory aims if the government insists on permanent measures without safeguards. AC Grayling Articles * Latest * Show all Profile Webfeed All AC Grayling articles About Webfeeds November 13, 2006 11:45 AM | Printable version Perhaps the most pressing political problem we face in contemporary Britain is: how do we preserve our civil liberties while effectively combating terrorism? The conjunction of two things - the chilling survey of the current terrorist threat given by the head of MI5 last week, and the impending Queen's Speech which is sure to contain proposals for yet more civil-liberty-reducing legislation - makes finding an answer yet more urgent. Here is a suggested one. In a time of genuinely serious threat, it is justified to place temporary and careful limits on certain civil liberties, if a good case can be made for doing so. The stress lies on the words "genuinely", "temporary", "careful" and "if a good case can be made for doing so". Assume that the threat is indeed serious. Then it would be justified for the government to institute a temporary and limited regime of emergency powers - temporary in the strict sense that they lapse after 12 months, but are renewable for a further 12 months on advice provided, after examination of the need for their continuance, by two separate bodies: a panel of judges, and a committee of both houses of parliament. The proposal to renew the powers should then be debated in parliament, and voted upon. Renewal might occur every year for a number of years; some powers might be found unnecessary and allowed to lapse, and others adopted, on the same annually lapsing basis, as the nature of the threat evolves. Eventually, the threat will dissipate, and the powers can then die a grateful and automatic death. With the safeguard of annual renewability on these terms, such aids to security as monitoring of financial transactions, use of intercept evidence in court, and longer periods of remand, can be temporarily justified given the threat posed by increasingly sophisticated people intent on mass murder. What is totally unacceptable is permanent reduction of civil liberties, as currently envisaged by the government. The government's probable next leader also appears to be committed to the false proposition that security matters above all else. It matters all right - but not above liberty and justice. Those who care about the latter are unlikely to be persuaded that liberty and justice have had their day and that we must now take ourselves permanently hostage, thus in any case doing what the mass murderers are themselves bent on doing, by breaking our polity and remaking it closer to their own desire. If the government wishes to forge a consensus on the question of how to enhance security while protecting civil liberties, something close to this suggestion must be right. What possible reason, in any case, could there be for making civil-liberty-reducing measures permanent? The head of MI5 says that the terrorist threat might last a generation; a generation is a blink of an eye in historical terms. What purpose does our government think will be served by permanent limitations of liberties once the threat has passed - unless the purpose in question is the convenience of governments even in unthreatening times? For governments are ever on the alert for ways to make life easier in the face of pesky citizens who will insist on having minds of their own.